Jump to content

Welcome to Second Shifters Forums
Register now to gain access to all of our features. Once registered and logged in, you will be able to create topics, post replies to existing threads, give reputation to your fellow members, get your own private messenger, post status updates, manage your profile and so much more. If you already have an account, login here - otherwise create an account for free today!
Photo

Women vs. Wal-Mart


  • Please log in to reply
No replies to this topic

#1
Integra

Integra

    Yertle The Turtle

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 137 posts
  • Location:New York
  • Interests:Hmmm.... I don't know what to say other than I won't say anything. If you truly care to know.... Just ask away.
Just finished reading this and I've heard the complaints before about Wal-Mart. One of them was they payed less than minimum wage (something I read on a union newsletter), but some deny that. This is the latest trouble hitting this big chain. I can't believe that businesses haven't learned by now that this kind of crap will come back and bite them in the ass. *shrugs* Thats just my opinion. Have a look and you draw your conclusion on the stats for this.

Wal-Mart vs. 1.6M female workers
Judge certifies sex discrimination case against No. 1 retailer.
June 22, 2004: 12:58 PM EDT

CHICAGO (Reuters) - A federal judge said Tuesday a lawsuit can proceed against Wal-Mart Inc. in what may be the biggest civil rights class-action in U.S. history as the company faces allegations it discriminated against female workers.

U.S. District Court Judge Martin Jenkins in San Francisco certified the class of about 1.6 million women who worked for Wal-Mart's U.S. stores at any time since December 26, 1998, attorneys for the six lead plaintiffs said.

The lawsuit, filed in 2001, accuses the largest U.S. private-sector employer of discriminating against women employees and retaliating against those who complained.

Wal-Mart said it would appeal the decision, released Tuesday, and said the ruling "has absolutely nothing to do with the merits of the case."

Wal-Mart's (WMT: down $0.96 to $53.97, Research, Estimates) stock sank 2.1 percent after the ruling in heavy trading on the New York Stock Exchange, where it was one of the most active issues.

Wal-Mart has previously denied a pattern of discrimination and said that the number of men in management reflects the higher number of applications it receives from men for management positions.

Lawyers for the plaintiffs said 70 percent of Wal-Mart's hourly employees are female, but women hold fewer than 15 percent of store manager positions.

The lawyers said female workers were routinely steered toward positions such as cashier, where there was little chance for promotion. According to court documents, one woman was told she was not qualified to be a manager unless she could stack 50-pound bags of dog food.

Wal-Mart faces dozens of lawsuits claiming violations of wage-and-hour laws and discrimination, but analysts think this one in particular could prove costly for Wal-Mart.

"The concern is the potential impact on earnings growth," said James Luke, who manages the large-company growth fund for BB&T Asset Management. "Wal-Mart may have to change the way they do business, and ultimately it could add to their cost structure."

Home Depot Inc. (HD: Research, Estimates) settled a sex discrimination case in 1997 for $104 million, and that case covered just 25,000 women. If Wal-Mart were forced to cough up a comparable $4,000 per person, that would be $6.4 billion, although legal experts have said a figure that high was very unlikely.

Emme Kozloff, retail analyst with Sanford Bernstein, said even a settlement or judgment in the billions of dollars "is not necessarily a death blow to Wal-Mart." She said every $1 billion of pretax settlement or damages would reduce earnings by about 15 cents a share. Wal-Mart earned $2.2 billion, or 50 cents a share, in its first quarter ended April 30.

Kozloff said Wal-Mart could cover up to $10 billion in damages or settlement costs with cash on hand and cash from its operations, but would probably have to suspend share repurchases.

Wal-Mart, based in Bentonville, Arkansas, employs more than 1.2 million people in the United States -- about two-thirds of whom are women -- and operates more than 3,000 U.S. stores.

Globally, Wal-Mart has more than 1.5 million employees, and stores in Mexico, Puerto Rico, Canada, Argentina, Brazil, China, South Korea, Germany and Britain.

Stung by high-profile lawsuits and negative press about employee treatment, Wal-Mart has recently turned up its public relations efforts with an advertising campaign featuring women and minority managers -- and new policies on pay and promotions.

CEO Lee Scott announced earlier this month that he and other top executives would forgo 7.5 percent of their bonuses this year if Wal-Mart does not meet certain diversity goals.

"Up until now, Wal-Mart has never faced a trial like this," Brad Seligman, lead attorney for the six women plaintiffs, said in a statement. "Lawsuits by individual women had no more effect than a pinprick. Now, however, the playing field has been leveled."

Most large class-action lawsuits in the United States are settled before they go to trial.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Copyright 2004 Reuters All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.





0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users