Jump to content

Welcome to Second Shifters Forums
Register now to gain access to all of our features. Once registered and logged in, you will be able to create topics, post replies to existing threads, give reputation to your fellow members, get your own private messenger, post status updates, manage your profile and so much more. If you already have an account, login here - otherwise create an account for free today!

"Medicare erroneously pays patients $50M"

  • Please log in to reply
1 reply to this topic

Enki Anunaki

Enki Anunaki

    Necromancer Extraordinaire

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 1,477 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Necropolis, Alaska
  • Interests:Yum! Toasty souls of the damned!
By KEVIN FREKING, Associated Press Writer
Wed Aug 23, 10:04 PM ET

"WASHINGTON - Don't cash that check. The federal government erroneously has reimbursed about 230,000 Medicare recipients for monthly premiums they paid this year for prescription drug coverage. For many, the checks — totaling nearly $50 million — have already arrived.


The refund will undoubtedly cause confusion, particularly because it comes with a letter that mistakenly instructs older people that their monthly premiums will no longer be deducted from their Social Security check.

Mark McClellan, who oversees the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, said people who get the check need to know two things. One, the money has to be returned. Two, their prescription drug coverage will continue.

"It's very important for people to know their coverage is continuing," he said. "There's no disruption at all."

Medicare officials say they caught the glitch just after the checks were sent out last week. As a result, they sent a second letter Tuesday letting people know about the problem. The average overpayment comes to about $215.

In many cases, older people get their Social Security payment through direct deposit. They, too, should set the extra money aside and not use it for other purposes because the payment will have to be returned, officials said.

About 5 million people pay their monthly premiums for Medicare drug coverage by having the government withhold the money from their Social Security check.

McClellan said his agency will make sure that insurers who administer the new drug benefit continue to get paid for the beneficiaries caught up in the error. He said that his agency was responsible for the error and that the subsequent letter contains an apology.

The error occurred as McClellan's agency updated the Social Security Administration about various changes in coverage that beneficiaries had requested. For instance, beneficiaries contact CMS because they want to switch plans or change how they pay their monthly premiums. CMS contacts Social Security officials because the changes often require an adjustment in the amount deducted from a beneficiary's checks. In this instance, the wrong information was transmitted, McClellan said.

McClellan also said that beneficiaries need to know the government won't be able to start making monthly premium deductions again until October.

He said the agency will work with beneficiaries who face a money crunch in the fall because they had already cashed the check from the Social Security Administration or because they cannot afford to have premiums from a few months deducted from one Social Security check.

The chairman of the Senate Finance Committee asked McClellan for a detailed report by Sept. 6 on how the error occurred. While the problem affects only a limited number of beneficiaries, it could have a large impact on them, said Sen. Charles Grassley (news, bio, voting record), R-Iowa.

"Some may not realize the error that was made and may not have put the money aside," Grassley said Wednesday. "Therefore, in my view the money should be recovered in increments that are manageable for beneficiaries. This implies that they should be recovered in increments over as long a period as possible rather than withheld from one Social Security check or otherwise repaid in full at one time.""


ain't this just the best damn government in the world? :P



    Daisy-Head Maizie

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,070 posts
  • Location:Athens, TN
  • Interests:Making the world a better place one smile at a time.
yes...yes it is XD

Now, if we only had local swiss banks...as most US banks would put a hold on such checks. I mean, if I was old & got a check for $50 million...I would have done my best to have hidden that money as QUICKLY as possible. And IMHO, a swiss bank would have been ideal.

Then my kids (which I don't actually have) would have been set for life...

On the other hand, with the average overage of $250 (what the fuck? does that mean someone SHOULD have gotten a 49.9 million dollar check?) I'd just have snickered & carried on.

0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users